How High Court May Rule On The Bare-Metal Defense

Law360 (October 16, 2018, 2:58 PM EDT) -- Hypotheticals involving ashtrays and flashlights, references to the least cost avoider and discussion of whether foreseeability should be considered for the existence of a duty, or proximate cause, or both — you'd be forgiven for guessing a law school seminar, but it was actually oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court. The court addressed foundational tort principles last Wednesday at oral argument in Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. Devries. The high court took the case to decide whether a defendant can be held liable, under maritime law, for products it did not make, sell or distribute.

Unbounded by statute or...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!