The Latest On Bristol-Myers' Class Action Application

Law360 (November 21, 2018, 1:05 PM EST) -- In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California,[1] the U.S. Supreme Court held that a California state court could not properly exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant with respect to nonresident plaintiffs’ mass tort claims. The court called its decision a “straightforward application ... of settled principles of personal jurisdiction,” yet the decision left open the question of whether the holding extends to nationwide class actions. District courts’ application of BMS has resulted in a mixed bag of opinions.

Many courts have extended the Supreme Court’s holding in BMS to class actions and mass tort actions and dismissed nonresident class...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!