High Court Won't Hear FCA Dispute Over Watershed Use

Law360 (January 7, 2019, 5:38 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined for the second time to hear a dispute over whether an Ohio flood control body’s retention of land in alleged violation of a federal agreement, as well as “fracking” and water payments gained from that land, subjected the body to liability under the False Claims Act.

The justices turned down the petition from relators Leatra Harper and Steven Jansto over the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District’s alleged violations of a decades-old flood control agreement with the federal government, due to its opening up of watershed land to oil and gas extraction, without comment.

MWCD helps to...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!