High Court Won't Hear FCA Dispute Over Watershed Use
Law360 (January 7, 2019, 5:38 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined for the second time to hear a dispute over whether an Ohio flood control body’s retention of land in alleged violation of a federal agreement, as well as “fracking” and water payments gained from that land, subjected the body to liability under the False Claims Act.
The justices turned down the petition from relators Leatra Harper and Steven Jansto over the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District’s alleged violations of a decades-old flood control agreement with the federal government, due to its opening up of watershed land to oil and gas extraction, without comment.
MWCD helps to...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!