Feature

Supreme Court Could Toss A Brick Through Antitrust Classes

Law360 (February 6, 2019, 4:09 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court could soon make it much more complicated to litigate price-fixing lawsuits, including major class actions, if the justices reverse a 1977 precedent that limits indirect purchasers' ability to bring antitrust claims.

Sometime this session, the justices will issue their opinion in Apple Inc. v. Robert Pepper et al., the tech giant's bid to undo a Ninth Circuit decision reviving a suit from consumers who accused Apple of monopolizing the app market. The company argues that for the purposes of this case, the consumers should be considered indirect purchasers because they don't buy apps directly from developers but...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!