'Imperfect' Treatment Result Not J&J Mesh's Fault, Jury Told
Law360, Philadelphia (March 26, 2019, 2:13 PM EDT) -- The failure of a Johnson & Johnson unit’s pelvic mesh implant to cure a Philadelphia-area woman’s incontinence did not mean the device was to blame for other complications she experienced, a Pennsylvania jury heard as a trial over the product opened Tuesday.
Andrea La’Verne Edney, an attorney with Butler Snow LLP representing J&J subsidiary Ethicon Inc., told jurors in Philadelphia that, even though the company’s mesh implant had failed to entirely cure Malgorzata Krolikowski of stress urinary incontinence that she complained to her doctor of 10 years ago, there were other reasons behind the pain during sex that she has experienced....
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!