Impact Of Justices' Excessive Fines Ruling Will Vary By State

By Vince Farhat and Kristin Asai (April 16, 2019, 1:17 PM EDT) -- On Feb. 20, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Timbs v. Indiana,[1] in which it unanimously ruled, for the first time, that the Eighth Amendment's excessive fines clause is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. The Timbs decision puts all U.S. states and cities on notice that their asset forfeiture rules and other fine regimes must comply with the Eighth Amendment. As such, Timbs potentially provides a new basis for individuals or companies to challenge fines that are grossly disproportionate to the behavior at issue or actual financial harm caused....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!