Law360 (April 26, 2019, 5:02 PM EDT) -- On April 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court imposed yet another roadblock to class arbitration, in Lamps Plus Inc. v. Varela. Relying on Stolt-Nielsen SA v. AnimalFeeds International Corp., the court ruled that ambiguous language in an arbitration agreement provides an insufficient basis for concluding a party has agreed to class arbitration.
Given the Federal Arbitration Act,’s broad effect, Lamps Plus virtually forecloses a court’s ability to order parties to class arbitration. But one trapdoor remains, because the court did not address whether the availability of class arbitration constitutes an issue of arbitrability to be decided by courts, unless “clearly and unmistakably” assigned to the arbitrator....
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!