Indirect Purchaser Standing In Federal Court

Law360 (August 28, 2009, 1:35 PM EDT) -- Indirect purchasers — i.e. those who purchase a product not directly from the manufacturer but indirectly, usually as a component of a different product — often have no standing to bring damage claims under federal antitrust law. But, that is not to say that indirect purchaser suits do not end up in federal court.

Many states allow indirect purchasers to sue for antitrust violations and, particularly after the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act which relaxed the requirements for removal based on diversity jurisdiction, more indirect purchaser suits are finding their way into federal court.

How, then, do federal courts...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!