6th Circ. Judges Argue Over Using Tech To Interpret Statutes

Law360 (July 11, 2019, 9:44 PM EDT) -- Two Sixth Circuit judges argued in an opinion Wednesday over using a computerized linguistics database to interpret the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and other statutes, with one judge endorsing the new technology and another saying the tech is impractical and no better than using a dictionary.

The pair took turns arguing over the new technology in separate concurring opinions attached to a decision that found Safelite Group Inc.'s deferred compensation plan is not a bonus plan exempt from ERISA based on the plain meaning of the statute.

Although all three judges on the panel agreed on the conclusion, two of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Appellate - 6th Circuit

Nature of Suit

4190 Contract: Other

Date Filed

May 1, 2018

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics