NJ Ruling Removes Evidence Hurdle For Asbestos Defendants

Law360 (September 26, 2019, 4:23 PM EDT) -- On Sept. 11, the New Jersey Supreme Court overruled the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey's decision in Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Co. — a decision which, if it had been upheld, would have severely hampered trial defendants' ability to allocate fault to settled defendants.[1] The pendulum has now swung back, and a sense of normalcy has returned to asbestos litigation in Middlesex County, New Jersey.

The 16-page decision can be consolidated into one concise statement: Trial defendants are permitted to introduce into evidence settled defendants' interrogatory responses and corporate representatives' testimony to prove allocation of fault...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!