FCA Decision Tracker: Continued Interpretations Of Escobar

Law360 (October 10, 2019, 7:24 PM EDT) -- More than three years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Escobar decision, courts continue to wrangle with how to interpret the ruling in False Claims Act suits, including in a spate of recent cases addressing two key questions the justices left open.

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a unanimous high court in Universal Health Services v. Escobar in June 2016, said that the "implied certification" doctrine could be used to back FCA claims.

The principle allows entities to be held liable if they implicitly, but falsely, certify they’ve complied with underlying legal, regulatory and contractual requirements when making claims for federal...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS