9th Circ. Sees Climate Problem But Rejects Plaintiffs' Solution
By Paul Weiland and Benjamin Rubin (February 3, 2020, 5:18 PM EST) -- A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found last month that a group of plaintiffs lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to challenge the federal government's alleged failure to protect and promote a "climate system capable of sustaining human life."
While scholars may debate the extent to which individual court decisions affect society, according to U.S. District Judge Josephine L. Staton, the author of the dissent, this decision could very well mean the destruction of "the United States as we currently know it." Remarkably, based on the statements in the decision,...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!