Law360 (February 26, 2020, 9:46 PM EST) -- A California federal judge said on Wednesday that an investor needed to explain more specifically why he claimed Ripple made fraudulent claims about its securities in his suit alleging the company violated the registration requirements of the Securities Act and state statutes when it ran an online initial coin offering for the cryptocurrency XRP.
In her Feb. 26 order granting in part and denying in part Ripple's bid to end the case, U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton cited seven examples of too-general allegations lead plaintiff Bradley Sostack included in his Aug. 5 consolidated proposed class action complaint against Ripple, a...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!