Toyota Dealer Wins Bid To Arbitrate Customer's Fraud Claims

Law360 (July 13, 2020, 5:11 PM EDT) -- The New Jersey state appeals court ruled Monday that a customer of a Toyota auto dealership in Wood-Ridge must arbitrate his allegations that his trade-in vehicle was undervalued, reasoning that the parties agreed to deal with claims out of court.

A two-judge Appellate Division panel disagreed with a Superior Court judge's finding that the arbitration provisions contained in East Coast Toyota's motor vehicle retail order and retail sales installment contracts were ambiguous and thus unenforceable due to wording inconsistencies. The dealership had sought to compel arbitration of Teofilo Guzman's lawsuit.

"The arbitration provisions signed by plaintiff in both the retail order and...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!