Pay-For-Delay May Need More Evidence After 3rd Circ. Ruling

Law360 (July 21, 2020, 4:13 PM EDT) -- On April 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in In re: Lamictal overturned a district court decision certifying a class of direct purchaser plaintiffs who purchased branded and generic versions of the pharmaceutical product Lamictal (lamotrigine), a treatment for epilepsy and bipolar disorder.[1]

This decision is notable because it includes an acknowledgment that the use of average prices may be highly misleading in cases where there are individual price negotiations, widespread use of discounting and strategic pricing by sellers in the marketplace. Importantly, this decision involves the pharmaceutical industry, where at least some of those circumstances are...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!