9th Circ. Told Weedkiller Ruling Ignores EPA's Bad Science

Law360 (September 16, 2020, 2:20 PM EDT) -- Advocacy groups want the Ninth Circuit to revisit a decision that largely backed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's approval of a Corteva Agriscience weedkiller, arguing the agency sidestepped a careful analysis of the product's impact on hundreds of species in violation of the Endangered Species Act.

The National Family Farm Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity and other groups said Tuesday that a divided panel of the court ignored the EPA's use of bad science and the ESA's requirement that the agency consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service about species impacted by a weedkiller that can be used on millions...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!