What Ethernet Patent Ruling Means For Claim Amendments

By Ben Pleune and Karlee Wroblewski (October 5, 2020, 4:09 PM EDT) -- Continuation practice is as popular as ever at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. This is due, at least in part, to the potential for patent challenges before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

This is often seen as an advantage to the patent owner, permitting flexibility with a future, perhaps narrower claim scope that can be used to combat the negative consequences of a successful post-grant review or inter partes review, and it often presents an easier avenue for modifying claim scope than amendments at the PTAB.

The amendment procedures of the PTAB are notoriously unsuccessful. Recently, the PTAB reviewed...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!