Tenn. Man Says Sanctions Unwarranted In Vape Battery Suit

Law360 (December 22, 2020, 10:49 PM EST) -- A man suing Samsung over an allegedly defective e-cigarette battery has asked a Tennessee federal judge to reject the company's bid for spoliation sanctions, saying his expert didn't intentionally destroy the batteries involved in the explosion.

James G. Howard said Monday that Samsung failed to prove the criteria for spoliation, which involves knowingly ruining evidence that the side considers to be potentially harmful. Instead, he argued that the batteries were already destroyed by the time his expert got them due to the initial explosion that led to the suit's filing.

Samsung claimed in November that Howard's expert, Eric Dix, did his...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!