Courts, FTC May Differ On Sponsored Product Reviews

Law360 (February 19, 2021, 3:23 PM EST) -- Does the First Amendment protect the publisher of supposedly independent product reviews if it turns out that the publisher was actually paid to favor certain products over others?

The Federal Trade Commission has already staked out a pretty clear position on when sponsored product reviews are deceptive. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also considered this issue recently in Ariix LLC v. NutriSearch Corporation,[1] and reached somewhat different conclusions.

NutriSearch publishes the NutriSearch Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements, a book that compares and reviews nutritional supplements sold in the direct marketing industry. The guide rates nutritional supplements in...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!