Fed. Circ. Says Dropbox Rival's IP Claims Are Nonsensical

By Andrew Karpan (February 12, 2021, 6:57 PM EST) -- The Federal Circuit on Friday declined to revive a New Jersey data transfer company's infringement case against Dropbox Inc., and called the claims of one of its patents in the case too "nonsensical" for patent protection.

A three-judge appellate panel said in a published opinion that U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. rightly tossed Synchronoss Technologies Inc.'s case against Dropbox in 2019.

In reviewing the three Synchronoss patents at issue in the California federal court case, the appeals panel found that claims Synchronoss had asserted in two of its patents were invalid as indefinite and it agreed with Judge Gilliam's...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!