L'Oreal Won't Face 'Subjective' Claims In UMass Cream Suit

By Andrew Karpan (April 21, 2021, 9:27 PM EDT) -- Months ahead of a June jury trial, a federal judge in Delaware axed two patents that the University of Massachusetts says L'Oreal infringed through its moisturizer brands to the tune of more than $200 million, ruling that depositions from the patents' inventor revealed the claims were "purely subjective."

In a ruling Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Colm F. Connolly agreed with L'Oreal's summary judgment motion that all of the contested claims in two UMass skin treatment patents, which cover a method for adding adenosine to a moisturizing cream, were indefinite, thus rendering the patents invalid.

"UMass has effectively conceded that the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!