Insurer Calls Brunch Chain's Virus Argument 'A Mockery'

By Rosie Manins
Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our weekly newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the weekly Coronavirus briefing.

Sign up for our Appellate newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:

Select more newsletters to receive for free [+] Show less [-]

Thank You!

Law360 (May 26, 2021, 6:26 PM EDT) -- Zurich American Insurance Co. urged the Eleventh Circuit on Wednesday to reject a national brunch restaurant chain's argument for pandemic-related coverage as making "a mockery" of the plain language in its policy.

The insurer said First Watch Restaurants Inc. can't get coverage for its economic losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic because it hasn't suffered any related direct physical loss of, or damage to, property at its 400 brunch locations in 29 states.

First Watch argued on appeal of a lower court's dismissal of its suit that its commercial property insurance policy with Zurich covered a drop in revenue due to pandemic restrictions on in-person dining.

"That argument makes a mockery of the policy's plain wording and standard canons of contract construction," Zurich said in its appellee's brief. "First Watch seeks to rewrite the policy and well-established Florida law along the way, demanding that the court set aside its common sense."

Zurich successfully moved to toss First Watch's October complaint, which a Florida trial judge dismissed with prejudice in February.

The insurer said Wednesday that COVID-19 orders from federal and state lawmakers, regulating what activities a business can or cannot conduct on its property, do not constitute or cause direct physical loss of, or damage to, property.

"First Watch challenges the district court's observation of that unassailable fact, but its challenge has no merit," Zurich said in its brief.

The restaurant chain argued in October that its Zurich policy limits were $215.2 million in property damage and $80.8 million in "time element" coverage, which is for losses resulting due to direct physical loss of, or damage to, property that occur over a period of time.

In a letter to Zurich at the end of March 2020, First Watch said its dine-in service was prohibited or restricted because of the pandemic at 350 locations in 29 states, case filings show.

U.S. District Court Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington said in her Feb. 4 order that economic losses such as First Watch's cannot be covered by property insurance policies. She said other Florida courts had determined while examining almost identical policies that a business interruption loss must result from a physical problem with the property.

Zurich urged the Eleventh Circuit to affirm the trial judge's ruling, saying First Watch's contention that the policy requires only damage, not modified by the words direct or physical, further tortures the policy's clear language.

"First Watch's argument also leads to an absurd reading of the policy under which any government regulation with a 'bad effect' on First Watch's business activities is swept within policy terms designed to insure against direct physical loss of, or damage to, property," Zurich said.

The insurer said government orders regulating business activity, like those implemented in Florida and other states during the coronavirus pandemic, cannot be used to put insurance companies on the hook for damages outside policy limits. And a contrary conclusion "threatens a sweeping expansion of property insurance coverage for every government regulation impacting a business's activities or income."

Zurich said its policy for First Watch also contained a contamination exclusion, so even if the presence of a virus could be construed as causing direct physical loss or damage, coverage would be denied. The contamination exclusion applied to any cost, including the inability to use or occupy property, it said.

Because First Watch did not allege that any property needed to be repaired or replaced, or seek insurance coverage for any property repair or replacement, its claim was rightly denied, Zurich said. None of the chain's properties were tangibly altered by pandemic restrictions, and First Watch was not permanently physically deprived of any property, the insurer said.

"Instead, First Watch's restaurants remained in the same condition they were in the moment after the [pandemic] orders went into effect," Zurich said.

The Eleventh Circuit has previously ruled in an unpublished opinion that COVID-19-related business interruptions are only economic losses not covered by property insurance policies. But First Watch said in its appellant's brief that its policy with Zurich is unique and different from other commercial property policies.

Counsel for Zurich declined to comment on Wednesday.

Counsel for First Watch did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Zurich American Insurance Co. is represented by Patrick E. Hofer, Timothy A. Carroll and Gabriela A. Richeimer of Clyde & Co. LLP and Katherine E. Giddings, Gary J. Guzzi and Anthony W. Morris of Akerman LLP.

First Watch is represented by Bard D. Rockenbach and Nichole J. Segal of Burlington & Rockenbach PA and Kenneth J. McKenna and Ryan K. Young of Dellecker Wilson King McKenna Ruffier & Sos LLP.

The case is First Watch Restaurants Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co., case number 21-10671, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

--Additional reporting by Daphne Zhang. Editing by Jill Coffey.

For a reprint of this article, please contact

Attached Documents

Useful Tools & Links

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

First Watch Restaurants, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.

Case Number



Appellate - 11th Circuit

Nature of Suit

4110 Insurance

Date Filed

March 01, 2021

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!