Law360 (October 22, 2010, 2:03 PM EDT) -- The scenario has become all too familiar over the past few years: a large, often multinational corporation agrees to enter into either a nonprosecution agreement (NPA) or a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the U.S. Department of Justice or a local U.S. attorney’s office. One of the terms of the agreement mandates the appointment of a corporate monitor for the duration of the NPA or the DPA. Then the question arises — Who will be selected as the monitor?
This question stirred debate three years ago when former Attorney General John Ashcroft was selected by then U.S. Attorney Chris Christie in...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!