Lessons From Post-Uniloc Cases

Law360, New York (September 14, 2011, 3:55 PM EDT) -- The recent decision in Uniloc USA Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation has done more than reverse years of reliance on the “25-percent rule.” If recent decisions in the federal district courts are any indication, it has caused — or at least signaled — an increased focus on the logical and legal support for damages allegations in patent cases.

In Uniloc the Federal Circuit rejected use of the “25-percent rule of thumb” as inconsistent with the standards set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. Specifically, the...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.