Case Study: Starbucks V. Wolfe's

Law360, New York (January 13, 2012, 12:47 PM EST) -- Stating that the anti-dilution law should be used as “a scalpel, not a battle axe,” U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York once again found that Starbucks Corp. failed to prove that the famous "Starbucks" trademark was likely to be diluted by the use of the marks "Charbucks Blend," "Mr. Charbucks" and "Mister Charbucks" on dark roasted coffee. In her Dec. 23, 2011, opinion, she ordered that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant, Wolfe’s Borough Coffee Inc., and...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.