Consumer Sours On Sugar In The Raw Advertising

Law360, New York (January 5, 2012, 8:22 PM EST) -- The companies that market Sugar in the Raw were slapped with a proposed class action in California federal court Wednesday by a consumer who says the product's name and label constitute false advertising because the product is not actually raw sugar.

The consumer, a California woman named Talee Rooney, claims that she bought a box of Sugar in the Raw because she believed the product was entirely unrefined, raw cane sugar. Rooney said she would not have bought the product, or would have paid less for...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Rooney v. Cumberland Packing Corp. et al


Case Number

3:12-cv-00033

Court

California Southern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

Marilyn L. Huff

Date Filed

January 4, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.