Artist Prince's Appropriation Not Fair Use, 2nd Circ. Hears

By Abigail Rubenstein (January 26, 2012, 6:52 PM EST) -- Photographer Patrick Cariou urged the Second Circuit on Wednesday to uphold a ruling that appropriation artist Richard Prince had violated his copyright, arguing fair use did not apply because Prince had used his photographs in new works without justification.

The dispute, which is being closely watched in the art world, stems from Prince's artwork series "Canal Zone." The series included 29 paintings, 28 of which included collaged, enlarged, cropped, tinted or over-painted images taken from Cariou's book of photographs "Yes, Rasta," according to court papers.

A New York federal judge held in March that the fair-use exemption to copyright protection did...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!