Amara Ruling Should Kill Pension Plan's Kickback Suit: ING

Law360, New York (February 3, 2012, 5:16 PM EST) -- ING Life Insurance & Annuity Co. on Thursday argued that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Amara decision negated a ruling that one of three claims could proceed to trial in a putative class action alleging ING engaged in a pay-for-play scheme with mutual funds in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

In its motion for reconsideration, ING contended that U.S. District Judge Janet C. Hall’s Jan. 19 decision to allow the pension plan administrator of Healthcare Strategies Inc.’s claim for breach of fiduciary duty to...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Healthcare Strategies, Inc. v. ING Life Ins & Annuity Co


Case Number

3:11-cv-00282

Court

Connecticut

Nature of Suit

Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Judge

William G. Young

Date Filed

February 23, 2011

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.