Wal-Mart Says New Sex Bias Action Fails Dukes Standard

Law360, New York (March 6, 2012, 7:42 PM EST) -- Wal-Mart Stores Inc. argued Monday that a new proposed class of more than 50,000 female employees accusing the big-box retailer of discriminatory practices is too broad to satisfy the high court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, which requires class members to face a common injury.

In a motion filed in Texas federal court, the Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer sought to toss plaintiff Stephanie Odle’s class claims, arguing that her suit alleges the same general gender stereotyping claims that the U.S. Supreme Court rejected in its...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc

Case Number



Texas Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Employment


Reed C O'Connor

Date Filed

October 28, 2011

Law Firms


Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.