Wal-Mart Sex Bias Plaintiffs Defend Pared Class In New Case

Law360, New York (March 30, 2012, 10:21 PM EDT) -- Plaintiffs in a decade-old gender discrimination suit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. argued Friday that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decertification of their original class does not bar consideration of modified classes and that their amended class claims are not time-barred.

In a statement of opposition against Wal-Mart’s motion to dismiss their latest amended complaint, the plaintiffs argue that, contrary to Wal-Mart’s assertions, the high court’s reversal of their certification in no way prohibited the Northern District of California from considering modified, narrower classes.

“As the Supreme Court declined to...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.


Case Number

3:01-cv-02252

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge

Charles R. Breyer

Date Filed

June 8, 2001

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.