Victoria's Secret Parent Can't Duck All Pregnancy Bias Claims

Law360, New York (August 17, 2012, 1:32 PM EDT) -- A New York federal judge pared down a pregnancy discrimination and overtime collective action against Victoria's Secret parent Limited Brands Inc. on Thursday, but refused to nix pregnancy bias and retaliation claims against the company.

U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on two motions for summary judgment, one from Limited Brands and several Victoria's Secret entities and another from individual defendant Ann O'Malley, for whom plaintiff Fredda Malena worked as an executive assistant before being terminated in 2009.

The defendants took aim at Malena's claims...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Malena et al v. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC et al


Case Number

1:09-cv-05849

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Labor: Fair Standards

Judge

J. Paul Oetken

Date Filed

June 24, 2009

Law Firms

Companies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.