Clorox Can't Be Sued For Ad Claims About Cats' Favorite Litter

Law360, New York (August 27, 2012, 4:56 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on Friday trimmed a consolidated class action over Clorox Co.’s allegedly deceptive Fresh Step cat litter ad campaign, saying promotional claims based on the intelligence or individual preferences of cats amount to subjective puffery.

A consolidated suit brought by individuals from five states alleges Clorox misled consumers by advertising Fresh Step’s carbon-based litter as more effective at neutralizing odor than noncarbon brands and as being preferred by cats over other brands. U.S. Senior District Judge Samuel Conti stripped all claims based on...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Segarra v. The Clorox Company


Case Number

3:12-cv-01051

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Fraud

Judge

Samuel Conti

Date Filed

March 2, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.