Wal-Mart Says Texas Sex-Bias Class Action Is Time-Barred

Law360, Dallas (October 4, 2012, 9:02 PM EDT) -- Wal-Mart Stores Inc. argued in Texas federal court Thursday that the claims of a putative class of 50,000 women who allege the retailer discriminated against its female employees expired after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a broader class in Wal-Mart v. Dukes.

Wal-Mart asked U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor to throw out the claims, brought in October 2011 by former members of the Dukes class, that allege women were paid less and wrongly denied promotions. In the 2011 Dukes decision, the Supreme Court held classes...
To view the full article, register now.



Case Information

Case Title

Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc

Case Number



Texas Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Employment


Reed C O'Connor

Date Filed

October 28, 2011

Law Firms


Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.