Wal-Mart Says Texas Sex-Bias Class Action Is Time-Barred

Law360, Dallas (October 4, 2012, 9:02 PM EDT) -- Wal-Mart Stores Inc. argued in Texas federal court Thursday that the claims of a putative class of 50,000 women who allege the retailer discriminated against its female employees expired after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a broader class in Wal-Mart v. Dukes.

Wal-Mart asked U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor to throw out the claims, brought in October 2011 by former members of the Dukes class, that allege women were paid less and wrongly denied promotions. In the 2011 Dukes decision, the Supreme Court held classes...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc


Case Number

3:11-cv-02954

Court

Texas Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Employment

Judge

Reed C O'Connor

Date Filed

October 28, 2011

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.