Employers Brace For More Mini-Class Actions After Dukes

Law360, New York (October 3, 2012, 8:29 PM EDT) -- With female Wal-Mart Stores Inc. employees launching a third high-profile regional discrimination suit Tuesday on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court's decertification of a massive nationwide class, attorneys say national employers should be prepared for an increase in similar coordinated regional class actions.

The Supreme Court's June 2011 Wal-Mart v. Dukes ruling nixed the certification of a class of 1.5 million female employees, but the plaintiffs quickly amended their original suit accusing the retail giant of sex discrimination to include only women in Wal-Mart's California...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.


Case Number

3:01-cv-02252

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge

Charles R. Breyer

Date Filed

June 8, 2001


Case Title

Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc


Case Number

3:11-cv-02954

Court

Texas Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Employment

Judge

Reed C O'Connor

Date Filed

October 28, 2011


Case Title

Phipps et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.


Case Number

3:12-cv-01009

Court

Tennessee Middle

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge

Kevin H. Sharp

Date Filed

October 2, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.