Gogo Denies Class Claims Of In-Flight Internet Monopoly

Law360, New York (December 11, 2012, 1:55 PM EST) -- Gogo Inc. on Monday asked a California federal court to throw out a proposed class action accusing the in-flight Internet provider of achieving a monopoly on the industry through unfair airline contracts, arguing that contrary to the class claims, the market for such services remains “dynamic and competitive.”

In a motion to dismiss, Gogo disputed the putative class representative's allegations that the company has control over the in-flight Internet market, protesting it lacks the ability to dictate pricing in the market as alleged.

“To state a...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Stewart v. Gogo, Inc.


Case Number

3:12-cv-05164

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Anti-Trust

Judge

Maxine M. Chesney

Date Filed

October 4, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.