We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Profile

Q&A With Seyfarth Shaw's Gerald L. Maatman Jr.

Law360 (November 14, 2007, 12:00 AM EST) -- Rule 23 standards are so plaintiff-friendly, especially in the Ninth Circuit, that some jokingly suggest that it’s possible to certify a ham sandwich in California. Class certification case law has lost its moorings to the purposes of multiparty litigation, says Seyfarth Shaw's Gerald L. Maatman Jr. in our series of chats with high-profile employment lawyers.

Q. What attracted you to employment law as a practice area? And what keeps you interested?

A. The chance to try jury cases after the advent of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 sealed my devotion to practicing employment law. The myriad ways in which people...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS