Sioux Honey Beats Class Action Over Pollen-Free Product

Law360, Los Angeles (January 15, 2013, 6:25 PM EST) -- A California federal judge on Monday tossed a proposed class action accusing Sioux Honey Association Cooperative of marketing its honey product as “honey” despite the fact the pollen had been removed, finding federal and state law didn’t require the honey producer to disclose the pollen’s absence.

U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen granted Sioux Honey’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Soraya Ross’ allegations that the company violated state and federal labeling laws and state fraud and unfair competition laws by marketing Sue Bee Clover Honey in California...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Ross v. Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative

Case Number



California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions


Edward M. Chen

Date Filed

April 2, 2012

Law Firms

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.