Taser Beats $10M False Ad Suit Over Calif. Firearm Status

Law360, Los Angeles (January 16, 2013, 5:01 PM EST) -- A California federal judge on Tuesday tossed a customer’s $10 million putative class action against Taser International Inc. alleging the company didn’t tell consumers that its stun guns are considered firearms under state law, saying the plaintiff failed to support her false advertising and unfair competition claims.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins found plaintiff Chiko Katiki had standing to sue Taser for damages resulting from her $300 purchase of its C2 electronic control device, or ECD, but granted the self-defense company’s motion to dismiss her...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Katiki v. Taser International Inc


Case Number

3:12-cv-05519

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Nathanael M. Cousins

Date Filed

October 25, 2012

Law Firms

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.