Seneca Hit With Class Action Over Coinsurance Penalties

Law360, New York (January 17, 2013, 5:10 PM EST) -- A Seneca Insurance Co. unit was hit with a proposed class action Monday in Pennsylvania federal court alleging it shortchanges some policyholders by assessing a coinsurance penalty on the replacement cost of a damaged property instead of its actual cash value.

Policyholder Emanuel Ruth Investment Corp. alleges Seneca Specialty Insurance wrongly rejected its request to file a claim for the actual cash value of a damaged property and instead determined the claim according to the higher replacement value, which would force the company to pay a...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

EMANUEL RUTH INVESTMENT CORP. v. SENECA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al


Case Number

2:13-cv-00283

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDR

Date Filed

January 13, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.