9th Circ. Juicy Juice Ruling Could Curb Food Labeling Suits

Law360, San Diego (February 21, 2013, 8:57 PM EST) -- The growing number of consumer suits accusing food and beverage companies of making unsubstantiated health benefit claims on their products’ labels could be slashed if the Ninth Circuit backs the dismissal of a proposed class action against Nestle USA Inc. and finds the plaintiffs must present scientific evidence showing the claims are false, attorneys said.

Buyers of Nestle’s Juicy Juice told the Ninth Circuit at a Feb. 12 oral arguments hearing that a California district court wrongly tossed their proposed nationwide class action claiming Nestle made...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Mauricio Chavez v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al


Case Number

2:09-cv-09192

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

George H. Wu

Date Filed

December 14, 2009

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.