Wal-Mart Fights Bid For Quick Appeal On Post-Dukes Claims

Law360, New York (March 18, 2013, 6:33 PM EDT) -- Wal-Mart Stores Inc. on Thursday opposed an attempt by three women to revive classwide gender bias claims against the retail giant in Tennessee federal court, saying the women wrongly claimed two U.S. Supreme Court rulings implicitly overruled a decision that led to the dismissal of their class claims.

Three women who were part of the nationwide class nixed by the Supreme Court's landmark 2011 Dukes ruling cited two high court rulings to back up their argument for an immediate appeal of the Feb. 20 ruling that...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Phipps et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.


Case Number

3:12-cv-01009

Court

Tennessee Middle

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge

Kevin H. Sharp

Date Filed

October 2, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.