Target False Ad Suit Over Pollen-Free Honey Doesn't Stick

Law360, New York (March 21, 2013, 5:13 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on Thursday tossed a putative class action accusing Target Corp. of deceiving its customers by labeling a pollen-free product as honey, finding that there is no widespread expectation among consumers that the honey they purchase contains pollen.

Named plaintiff Bertha Cardona had argued that a product Target markets as “pure honey” is neither pure nor honey because all the pollen had been removed, but U.S. District Judge George H. King said pollen is not a “characterizing ingredient” of honey that would require...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Bertha Cardona v. Target Corporation et al

Case Number



California Central

Nature of Suit

Fraud or Truth-In-Lending


George H. King

Date Filed

February 9, 2012

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.