Target False Ad Suit Over Pollen-Free Honey Doesn't Stick

Law360, New York (March 21, 2013, 5:13 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on Thursday tossed a putative class action accusing Target Corp. of deceiving its customers by labeling a pollen-free product as honey, finding that there is no widespread expectation among consumers that the honey they purchase contains pollen.

Named plaintiff Bertha Cardona had argued that a product Target markets as “pure honey” is neither pure nor honey because all the pollen had been removed, but U.S. District Judge George H. King said pollen is not a “characterizing ingredient” of honey that would require...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Bertha Cardona v. Target Corporation et al


Case Number

2:12-cv-01148

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Fraud or Truth-In-Lending

Judge

George H. King

Date Filed

February 9, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.