Bank Asks 9th Circ. To Junk $16M Verdict In Developer Row

Law360, Los Angeles (May 8, 2013, 3:44 PM EDT) -- Stearns Bank NA urged the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday to toss a $16 million judgment against it for allegedly breaching a real estate development contract, arguing that the trial judge gave faulty jury instructions that allowed the bank to be found liable for a federal agency's misconduct.

At oral arguments, James M. Harris of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, an attorney for Stearns, told a three-judge panel that it should not only vacate the judgment, but it should also enter an award in the bank's favor.

Stearns has...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Citrus El Dorado LLC v. Stearns Bank et al


Case Number

8:09-cv-01462

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

David O. Carter

Date Filed

December 11, 2009

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.