Bank Asks 9th Circ. To Junk $16M Verdict In Developer Row

Law360, Los Angeles (May 8, 2013, 3:44 PM EDT) -- Stearns Bank NA urged the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday to toss a $16 million judgment against it for allegedly breaching a real estate development contract, arguing that the trial judge gave faulty jury instructions that allowed the bank to be found liable for a federal agency's misconduct.

At oral arguments, James M. Harris of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, an attorney for Stearns, told a three-judge panel that it should not only vacate the judgment, but it should also enter an award in the bank's favor.

Stearns has...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Citrus El Dorado LLC v. Stearns Bank et al


Case Number

8:09-cv-01462

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

David O. Carter

Date Filed

December 11, 2009

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.