A Developing Circuit Split Over Vertical Restraints?

Law360, New York (July 19, 2013, 3:44 PM EDT) -- In Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007), the U.S. Supreme Court held that vertical resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements were not per se unlawful under the Sherman Act, but instead were to be evaluated under the rule of reason. Given the challenges of pleading and proving rule of reason cases, Leegin was heralded by some as the death knell for Sherman Act claims based on vertical restraints.

In United States of America v. Apple Inc., however, the Southern District of...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.