Conde Nast Beats Libel Suit Over New Yorker Article

Law360, New York (August 1, 2013, 5:08 PM EDT) -- A federal judge on Thursday threw out a libel suit a Canadian art expert brought against Conde Nast over a 2010 article in the New Yorker, ruling that the expert failed to meet the so-called actual malice standard.

U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken said Peter Paul Biro, a leader in a movement to scientifically authenticate art, had not shown that the New Yorker acted with actual malice when it published allegations that he may be a fraud. To meet that standard, a plaintiff must show...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Biro v. Conde Nast et al


Case Number

1:11-cv-04442

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Assault Libel & Slander

Judge

J. Paul Oetken

Date Filed

June 29, 2011

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.