Conde Nast Beats Libel Suit Over New Yorker Article

Law360, New York (August 1, 2013, 5:08 PM EDT) -- A federal judge on Thursday threw out a libel suit a Canadian art expert brought against Conde Nast over a 2010 article in the New Yorker, ruling that the expert failed to meet the so-called actual malice standard.

U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken said Peter Paul Biro, a leader in a movement to scientifically authenticate art, had not shown that the New Yorker acted with actual malice when it published allegations that he may be a fraud. To meet that standard, a plaintiff must show...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Biro v. Conde Nast et al


Case Number

1:11-cv-04442

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Assault Libel & Slander

Judge

J. Paul Oetken

Date Filed

June 29, 2011

Law Firms

Companies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.