BAE Shakes Whistleblower Suit Over Army Weapons Study

Law360, New York (August 22, 2013, 6:25 PM EDT) -- A Michigan federal judge on Thursday tossed a whistleblower suit brought against BAE Systems Inc. by two former employees accusing it of using insider information to overcharge the U.S. Army for a weapons study, saying the plaintiffs’ allegations failed to state a claim.

BAE, which operates in more than 100 countries, argued in a February motion to dismiss that plaintiffs Matt Paige and James Gammon had not met the heightened pleading standards for fraud under the False Claims Act.

The defense contractor asserted that they failed to...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Paige et al v. BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services, Inc.


Case Number

2:09-cv-11657

Court

Michigan Eastern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Stephen J. Murphy, III

Date Filed

May 1, 2009

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.