GSK, Teva Say Lamictal Deal Doesn't Break Antitrust Law

Law360, New York (September 9, 2013, 3:37 PM EDT) -- GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. urged a New Jersey federal judge Friday to dismiss claims by indirect purchasers of GSK's epilepsy drug Lamictal accusing the companies of entering a pay-for-delay settlement that was unlawful and anti-competitive.

The drugmakers said their deal, settling a patent infringement suit GSK filed against Teva over its attempt to produce a generic form of the anti-seizure medication, did not run afoul of antitrust laws because, contrary to the indirect purchasers' allegations, the settlement included no "reverse payment" from the patentee to the alleged infringer to keep a generic off the market.

"All counts fail...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!