Procter & Gamble Says Pringles Labeling Suit Won't Fly

Law360, Chicago (September 25, 2013, 7:17 PM EDT) -- The Procter & Gamble Co. on Tuesday urged a California federal judge to toss a proposed class action alleging the company’s Pringles chips have misleading labels about trans fat content, saying the plaintiffs can’t sue on the sole basis that the product violated a federal food-labeling regulation.

The plaintiffs claim that, while Pringles may contain “0 grams trans fat” as advertised, the label runs afoul of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation prohibiting such boasts when the product also has high levels of other fats,...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Samet v. Proctor and Gamble Company


Case Number

5:12-cv-01891

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Paul Singh Grewal

Date Filed

April 16, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.