Nestle Says False Ad Suit Doesn't Define 'All Natural'

Law360, New York (October 16, 2013, 1:35 PM EDT) -- Nestle USA Inc. urged a California federal court Monday to dismiss a putative class action against the food company, saying the plaintiff failed to define what she meant by “all natural” when she claimed Nestle duped her into buying food with artificial ingredients.

Nestle renewed its motion for dismissal, arguing that plaintiff Maritza Pelayo has not provided a plausible and coherent definition of the phrase and that regardless, the plaintiff lacks standing to bring the class action.

Pelayo is seeking to certify a class for a...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Maritza Pelayo v. Nestle USA Inc et al


Case Number

2:13-cv-05213

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

John F. Walter

Date Filed

July 18, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.