7th Circ. Says Policy Term Too Vague To Deny Fire Coverage

Law360, Los Angeles (October 23, 2013, 6:29 PM EDT) -- The Seventh Circuit held that State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Co.'s insurance policy term “residence premises” is ambiguous and should be liberally construed in favor of coverage, reversing on Wednesday a district court’s summary judgment for the insurer.

Plaintiffs Norman and Glenna Schuchman had asserted a claim against the homeowner’s policy State Auto had issued them, but after a lengthy investigation, State Auto denied the Schuchmans’ claim on the basis that the plaintiffs weren’t residing on the “residence premises,” as that term is defined by...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Norman Schuchman, et al v. State Auto Property & Casualty

Case Number



Appellate - 7th Circuit

Nature of Suit

4110 Insurance

Date Filed

July 27, 2012

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.